Posted January 21, 2006 I really like the option in fulDC to refresh seperate directories. Can it be added in ApexDC++? Thnx :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 21, 2006 I really like the option in fulDC to refresh seperate directories. Can it be added in ApexDC++? Thnx What is the point in this? You may as well just refresh the whole filelist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 21, 2006 What is the point in this? You may as well just refresh the whole filelist. refershing the whole list takes ages with big shares Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 21, 2006 refershing the whole list takes ages with big shares what you consider as big share? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 21, 2006 what you consider as big share? +400GB Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 21, 2006 +400GB it doesn't take too long if you just hash the new files, not complete share :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 21, 2006 I share 850Gb and fair enough it does take ages when your hashing for the very first time. but when you simply add new files to share it doesn't take any longer than the above option would. If you only hash a folder then you will only share that folder..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 21, 2006 it doesn't take too long if you just hash the new files, not complete share I hope you're not thinking i'm hashing my complete share every time........... I share +1000GB myself. I experienced that you need enough memory to refresh your filelist with a share like that without DC crashing. Anyway, it was just a request. Maybe I'm the only one who had this prob :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 25, 2006 Or Maybe You could guys improve the hashing system to hash more qucikly boost the speed of hash, that would help a lot of people let's say like the people who doesn't have a fast hard drive or i don't know .... but if you will improve the hash speed that would be great ... i don't know .... hope you can do this ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 25, 2006 Or Maybe You could guys improve the hashing system to hash more qucikly boost the speed of hash, that would help a lot of people let's say like the people who doesn't have a fast hard drive or i don't know .... but if you will improve the hash speed that would be great ... i don't know .... hope you can do this ... why to "fix" something that isn't broken users with limited RAM / slow HD can just limit the max hash speed. It's not that i don't like the idea of improving hashing speed, but i consider myself not familiar enough with TTH to go mess around with it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 25, 2006 Yeah, messing with hashing algorithms would not be a good idea unless totally confident. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 26, 2006 What about a live refresh?! would that hog the client. an automatic refresh of new files upon addon to the shared folders. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 26, 2006 What about a live refresh?! would that hog the client. an automatic refresh of new files upon addon to the shared folders. That would need constant monitoring of the hashed folders.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 1, 2006 why to "fix" something that isn't broken users with limited RAM / slow HD can just limit the max hash speed. It's not that i don't like the idea of improving hashing speed, but i consider myself not familiar enough with TTH to go mess around with it. Heh, the only way to make it hash even faster is to compile CPU specific versions much like Shareaza does sometimes. Those things hash huge files with all four of 'razas hashes (ed2k, md5, sha1, tth) in very small amounts of time. But it's too much of a hassle. That would need constant monitoring of the hashed folders.... Yes it would, but almost every P2p client does it, DC lags a long ways away from mainstream P2P. Of course, it could be just the way that DC++ was made. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 1, 2006 Kevo can you read your PM please. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
