Lee

Released: ApexDC++ 1.0.0 Beta 4

46 posts in this topic

1. Looks like an overlooked setting, unfortunately... If the hub is public, you may post the address.

2. Are there anything specific about these two non-suppressing hubs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Not sorted, but I am still trying to test...

2. Nothing specific. Seems to happen quite at random. Perhaps a settings refresh timing problem...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I agree, except the freezing on hitting Enter in PM (seldom) and the "ADLS crash" everything is ok for now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I agree, except the freezing on hitting Enter in PM (seldom) and the "ADLS crash" everything is ok for now.

I haven't actually found any of these bugs.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't actually found any of these bugs.....

And I have not found any diamonds... But I believe they do exist. :) Actually not a good example since there is a joke-law that if the event is some s*it, it inevitably concerns far more people, rather if it has been smth pleasant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-=[ ApexDC++ 1.0.0B4 Compiled on: 2007-08-07 ]=-

-=[ Uptime: 5 days 20 hours 14 min ][ Cpu time: 1:00:01 ]=-

-=[ Memory usage (peak): 60.33 MB (94.28 MB) ]=-

-=[ Virtual memory usage (peak): 54.55 MB (120.96 MB) ]=-

-=[ Downloaded: 903.84 MB ][ Uploaded: 3.91 MB ]=-

-=[ Total download: 222.18 GB ][ Total upload: 705.95 GB ]=-

-=[ System Uptime: 5 days 20 hours 14 min ]=-

-=[ CPU Clock: 3000.980842 MHz ]=-

No bugs or crashes to report. This is the client running on my server machine and its stats...decent uptime thought it may or may not be useful...Will report stats again when I reboot the server (HopeFully not for a while)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this version is often falls without any reason and without any communication, just quietly, the process, the most often used search

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-=[ ApexDC++ 1.0.0B4 Compiled on: 2007-08-07 ]=-

-=[ Uptime: 1 week 5 days 4 hours 22 min ][ Cpu time: 18:07:07 ]=-

-=[ Memory usage (peak): 111,22 MB (132,74 MB) ]=-

-=[ Virtual memory usage (peak): 143,13 MB (174,31 MB) ]=-

-=[ Downloaded: 12,85 GB ][ Uploaded: 39,50 GB ]=-

-=[ Total download: 474,82 GB ][ Total upload: 473,03 GB ]=-

-=[ System Uptime: 51 weeks 3 days 7 hours 34 min ]=-

-=[ CPU Clock: 805,222118 MHz ]=-

Just some Stats.

No problem until now with the beta 4 release..

Great job ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the incorrectly displayed uptime? It didn't exist in the previous versions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the incorrectly displayed uptime? It didn't exist in the previous versions.

Why you think it is incorrect? ;)

/off I am w/o I-net at home due to a storm, should be fixed soon,acc. to my ISP. /off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why you think it is incorrect? ;)

/off I am w/o I-net at home due to a storm, should be fixed soon,acc. to my ISP. /off

Probably because it shows that it's been up and running for almost a year even tho B4 isn't that old....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The system could be up for a year ;)

It the system,not the program :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can vouch for Nocits problem.. My server that has only been up 5 days since reboot is saying its been up 17 weeks. I have a dozen other people who are having the same issue. Noctis problem with it is not just related to him it is in fact a small bug somewhere but does not affect the program it only shows incorrect information. It is something that needs fixed but I see it causing no harm to the core of Apex at all. Crise please look into this as it is a verfied issue but not one that must be corrected immediately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

..the client is damn near perfect :) in rooms (like OP chat or whatever) you can double-click on names to get typed out, then there's the difference of "+me" and "/me" which shows (very nice), etc.; awesome job, too cool :)

it's neatly done, is what I'm trying to say; very smart..

Edited by bïöµï¢

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumbsup:

you should really improve the hash timing ... there are some bugs with jacek's aka arne's tth'ing ... happy hunting ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This dude is schizo, talking to self, bad idea :thumbsup:

LOL no comment!

Edited by Mikey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites