A AML Question

[Guest Toast]

If a user has a link in description do u want the possibility to have him displayed as a cheater (eg. advert) in next upcoming version of AML

Quote:

^(http(s)?://)?www\.[a-zA-Z0-9-_]{1,20}\.[A-Za-z]{2,3}$

[Teobald 0]

If a user has a link in description do u want the possibility to have him displayed as a cheater (eg. advert) in next upcoming version of AML

nope, i think its a fair way of advertisement for their websites. better than spamming main chat anways lol

btw thanks for your work Toast, its a great help for every OP :)

[RadoX 0]

Well it´s good to have but if you don´t wan´t it than you can just disable it

[Lee 84]

Displaying a link in their description has nothing to do with cheating, so I voted no.

PeerWeb DC++ originally had it's website link in there, to advertise.

[Zlobomir 3]

If a user has a link in description do u want the possibility to have him displayed as a cheater (eg. advert) in next upcoming version of AML

Quote:

^(http(s)?://)?www\.[a-zA-Z0-9-_]{1,20}\.[A-Za-z]{2,3}$

Toast said POSSIBILITY, so my reply is yes. Also, I would like to have the same if Limiter is detected, but not enabled to show in Settings>>General.

[Guest Toast]

i personally would love to see a feature that takes hilighted text (fuldc feat) that u can apply an action on that would be neat thing to do if so u could stop floods spam ect ect in main with action in settings

[Guest Toast]

Unwanted Users: Advertiser in Description (v.1) // info: User has www links in Description

^(http(s)?://|www\.)[a-zA-Z0-9]{3,15}([.-_])([a-zA-Z0-9]{3,15}|[A-Za-z]{2,3})(([.-_])([a-zA-Z0-9]{3,15}|[A-Za-z]{2,3}))?(/)?$

Unwanted Users: Advertiser in Description (v.2) // info: User has hub links in Description

^\S{0,}(hopto\.org|bounceme\.net|myftp\.(biz|org)|myvnc\.com|no-ip\.(biz|info|org)|redirectme\.net|servebeer\.com|serveblog\.net|sytes\.net|zapto\.org):[0-9]{1,5}$

these 2 could be included in next version they work really good

[Kulmegil 1]

PS I would like separate detection for limiter higher then 1Mb/s (1000kB/s let's say, coz some people do confuse units).

[Guest Toast]

please stick to the topic don't trail off with requests. ill think about it and the effects it might have (10mbit) hubs ect.

[MiRaGe 0]

i voted yes, cuz .... another possibility is never a bad thing -> at least we'll have the option to decide wether we need this option or not (i would definetally use it)

[Satan 1]

I picked no also. As a feel an un-intrusive advert such as that is ok.

[Noctis 0]

Somewhere description tags are disabled anyways so it wouldn't be useful there.

[Guest Toast]

AML 3.05

*fixed: Abandoned OP Client: UKC++

*updated: Unwanted Users: Team Members/Flooders (v.2)

*updated: FulDC Detection

*updated: Unwanted Users: Advertiser in Description (v.3)

*added: Unwanted Users: IP Adress in Description

*fixed: ApexDC++ Detection

*updated: Fake Client: Mode Hub Separator Charater Mismatched

*added: Unwanted Users: IP Adress as Nick

*added: Emulation Mode: ZR++

*added: Emulation Mode: RSX++

*updated: OP Client: zK++

*updated: Emulation Client: CrZDC++

the version coming soon

hehe its added since 3.04 got a lot of votes at other forums on this but the easy thing is to just enable kicks on these hubs where u don't think its appropriate to have it

[Coder 0]

I am little bit late because it exists in the AML already...but voted yes and auto kicking those already :(