Posted July 19, 2007 If a user has a link in description do u want the possibility to have him displayed as a cheater (eg. advert) in next upcoming version of AML Quote: ^(http(s)?://)?www\.[a-zA-Z0-9-_]{1,20}\.[A-Za-z]{2,3}$ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 19, 2007 If a user has a link in description do u want the possibility to have him displayed as a cheater (eg. advert) in next upcoming version of AML nope, i think its a fair way of advertisement for their websites. better than spamming main chat anways lol btw thanks for your work Toast, its a great help for every OP :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 19, 2007 Well it´s good to have but if you don´t wan´t it than you can just disable it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 19, 2007 Displaying a link in their description has nothing to do with cheating, so I voted no. PeerWeb DC++ originally had it's website link in there, to advertise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 19, 2007 If a user has a link in description do u want the possibility to have him displayed as a cheater (eg. advert) in next upcoming version of AML Quote: ^(http(s)?://)?www\.[a-zA-Z0-9-_]{1,20}\.[A-Za-z]{2,3}$ Toast said POSSIBILITY, so my reply is yes. Also, I would like to have the same if Limiter is detected, but not enabled to show in Settings>>General. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 20, 2007 i personally would love to see a feature that takes hilighted text (fuldc feat) that u can apply an action on that would be neat thing to do if so u could stop floods spam ect ect in main with action in settings Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 21, 2007 Unwanted Users: Advertiser in Description (v.1) // info: User has www links in Description ^(http(s)?://|www\.)[a-zA-Z0-9]{3,15}([.-_])([a-zA-Z0-9]{3,15}|[A-Za-z]{2,3})(([.-_])([a-zA-Z0-9]{3,15}|[A-Za-z]{2,3}))?(/)?$ Unwanted Users: Advertiser in Description (v.2) // info: User has hub links in Description ^\S{0,}(hopto\.org|bounceme\.net|myftp\.(biz|org)|myvnc\.com|no-ip\.(biz|info|org)|redirectme\.net|servebeer\.com|serveblog\.net|sytes\.net|zapto\.org):[0-9]{1,5}$ these 2 could be included in next version they work really good Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 21, 2007 PS I would like separate detection for limiter higher then 1Mb/s (1000kB/s let's say, coz some people do confuse units). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 21, 2007 please stick to the topic don't trail off with requests. ill think about it and the effects it might have (10mbit) hubs ect. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 31, 2007 i voted yes, cuz .... another possibility is never a bad thing -> at least we'll have the option to decide wether we need this option or not (i would definetally use it) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 1, 2007 I picked no also. As a feel an un-intrusive advert such as that is ok. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 2, 2007 Somewhere description tags are disabled anyways so it wouldn't be useful there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 2, 2007 AML 3.05 *fixed: Abandoned OP Client: UKC++ *updated: Unwanted Users: Team Members/Flooders (v.2) *updated: FulDC Detection *updated: Unwanted Users: Advertiser in Description (v.3) *added: Unwanted Users: IP Adress in Description *fixed: ApexDC++ Detection *updated: Fake Client: Mode Hub Separator Charater Mismatched *added: Unwanted Users: IP Adress as Nick *added: Emulation Mode: ZR++ *added: Emulation Mode: RSX++ *updated: OP Client: zK++ *updated: Emulation Client: CrZDC++ the version coming soon hehe its added since 3.04 got a lot of votes at other forums on this but the easy thing is to just enable kicks on these hubs where u don't think its appropriate to have it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 22, 2007 I am little bit late because it exists in the AML already...but voted yes and auto kicking those already :( Share this post Link to post Share on other sites