Pothead

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    105

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Pothead

  1. Posted

    Netgear have a really nice interface and are easy to setup and use. They are also have a problem prone to melting.

    Sweex have a really hard-to-use interface and are kind of a pain to setup and use. From what i seen of a m8's one, the hardware seems to be really good.

    Belkin are about average to setup. Have seen melted ones though.

    So i currently using Netgear but if i cannot get a warranty replacement if this one melts as well, i gonna get a Sweex next.

    Either that or stop being lazy and setup my old pc with Monowall on it. ;)

  5. Posted

    Sure but if I'd add this... I would have it with multiple files... but only one frame (then use eg. dropdown list in frame to switch between files) imo. this beats multiple frames any day.

    That's how i initially thought of doing it when requested of me, but i was lazy and didn't see the point of a second notepad. Someone else did it the copy paste method, and i used it ever since. lol.

  6. Posted

    I'd like the option to have multiple notepads, not sure how you'd want the GUI for it to be, but I guess it wouldn't be too hard to implement?

    About 3 minutes of copy pasting is all that's required. :)

  8. Posted

    Strange how not showing limiting is now classed faking. Times change i suppose.

    I see Vi7o's point though, dumb ops kick for any limiting. An uncapped upload kills the internet for any other App \ Network user sharing same line.

    And unfortuantly a happy medium is impossible to reach, because some people abuse upload limiters. :)

  13. Posted

    MOST of the older Op Clients, DCDM, rmDC, MCDC, R2++ etc.. are dead projects, or not getting much work. MOST are based on source .401, which is NOT even nmdc extended.
    So what is NMDC Extended ? You mean clients with partial / full ADC support ?

    then there is the issue of z-itself, there is zline, zport, and zpipe. then there is DC++ team variations
    What is zport ? Never heard of that one before. As for ZLine and ZPipe . . . . ZLine was the initial idea of how to do it, ZPipe is the complete version. Hence ZLine is redundant. Use ZPipe instead. :huh:

  15. Posted

    Just a comment about the Memory in Status bar request.

    Apparently the getMemUsage code which is commonly used in dc++ based clients is a bit buggy and can cause a random crash at some point. I've never had it happen to me, but i've heard it from quite a few different people.

    Having the memory usage updated every second or so (or how ever often the status bar is updated) increases the likely hood of the crash.

    Personally i like that feature, but that's also the reason it was removed from dcdm svn last year. :wacko:

  18. Posted

    upgrade that antique piece of software called oDC wich comes installed by the narrow minded ISP
    ISP's install P2P software ? Wow, which country do you live in ? I gotta move there.

    Anyway, if they are incable of turning a computer off, or upgrading something, they shouldn't be using pc's in the first place.

  21. Posted

    That way is a really bad idea. Open to abuse, and a pain in the arse to code. And it floods your hub with welcome messages. ;)

    Only feasible way is to give all the vip's a prefix. And protect all the people with that prefix. :)
    Incase you don't understand that . . . . .

    [VIP]AUser

    [VIP]AnotherUser

    [VIP]SomeRandomUser

    And protect everybody with [VIP].

  22. Posted

    It's not the fact that he refuses to upgrade, which i would class as a stupid action. It's the banning people who do upgrade i find stupid.

    "[14:04] <-=Librarian=-> Dc++ ver.690 and up and strong Dc++ ver 2.0 and up are not allowed here if your found using those clients you will be banned until you roll back to an earlier client "