Zlobomir

Tester
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    2403

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Zlobomir

  2. Posted

    OK, if it is easy to be coded, fine. I guess that nobody will get hurt, it will be convenient. But if it will make the client more resource consuming, better run two instances/clients. It is not hard, and one of them can be easily closed as needed.

  4. Posted

    Ако искаш, дай ми тестов акаунт за въпросния хъб, предполагам си собственика. Може би е възможно да се получи, ако си сетнал топика, а после си настройвал по правата на акаунтите.

  11. Posted

    Yes, you do have a point. But my point is that it is better to clear obstacles (bad speeds/ISPs) rather than producing workarounds. Since if we produce too many workarounds, it will end up in some cluttered up client... and ISPs will do what they want, we will be in the position to be called "damn leechers", etc... Resistance is the key. :)

  12. Posted

    What is the result with the superboot CD (WinPE)? Actually, do you see 2048MB in BIOS? I am on WinXP 32bit with 2GB RAM (2x1GB PQI 667@~811MHz). If you like playing with BIOS updates, etc, should be solved.

  13. Posted

    Looks like we managed to surpass 20,000 posts while releasing 1.0 to the public. Not a bad milestone for our project, lets hope the majority of posts are worthwhile. ;)

    I personally have doubt in the worthness of some of my posts, as I alone have surpassed 2 000 posts. But they were at least fun I hope. :):)

    P. S. +1 :P

  22. Posted

    the usual way to handle this out is to use two+ instances/two+ clients to stay in the respective hubs...

    p. s. Godric, dunno where you live, but here in BG things are not like in "the real world". We here also have very different LAN/BG peering/International speeds, but this is not normal to be so. So if things were OK, no workaround should be needed.