-
Content count
2403 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Zlobomir
-
-
Exactly, I am not criticizing BM for anything (aside from some major annoyances in the client, but this is another topic).
-
This one is taken from SMT mod / Greylink. Deserves attention only for OP version maybe. :rolleyes:
-
Не, мен ще ме обърка. Нека си има различни цветове. Който нещо не знае, да се научи.
-
Да, потвърди се. Дано скоро има корекция.
-
I meant if there really tend to be two or three standards of hublists.
-
Why can't you just disable that stupid UAC ? There was no UAC in Win3.11, Win95, Win98, WinME, Win2000 or WinXP and there was no problems, so why should there be a problem in Vista? Maybe because Vista is so dangerous and unsecure OS that it needs UAC? maybe, I have UAC disabled and no problem.If you still refuse to disable UAC, then stop asking question to solve your problem.
Thanks, I was expecting a user out of the Support group to provide "clear" answer, I've tried being polite. :thumbsup: :rolleyes:
-
horizontal chat, what, screenshot ?Um, chat showed on the top, not on the left (actually on the right now in 1.0.1). I see there is maybe some new code behind this, but it is worse for me. If still needed, will make a ss.
-
-
...or to downgrade, for the old annoying morons like me, who miss thehorizontal chat. Sorry for being such a pain in the a$$. :thumbsup:
-
??????????, ?????? ?? ?? ?????? ? ?? ??????, ??? ? ????????? ?????? - ??????????!
Please, keep Russian in the Russian section, or at leat provide translation! :thumbsup:
-
Umm, saving might have been broken in 1.0.1... Haven't tested it, don't ask ME why. :)
-
Still, for avoiding such errors, we might include two neighbour fall-down menus like:
Replace "falldown menu (column)" with "falldown menu (column)"
-
Maybe 1.0.1 already does, but was a bit pissed off by the lack of "horizontal chat/userlist" to test more, and copied the files from 1.0.0B5... About the removing of "horizontal chat/userlist", I guess it was done by BM, if not even by DC++ devs. I do not blame you, but would like it baaaaack. :-(
-
Well, in this case it helps to determine the bug by tracking the changes made in the code b/w versions.
-
lol ok. Point is disabling UAC aint good for your computer so is the last option!Point is, with all my respect, that you can't explain it better than "not good for your computer". Thinking in this way, Windows is not good for ANY computer, especially Vista. But I am on Windows by force of habit, will not use Vista any time soon tho.
i. e. Do not believe/use all the sh*t which has been bugged build in by MS. Many people here have had your problem, disabled UAC, nothing bad happened, they are still happy. :)
-
Another reason might be bad setting of limiter, by negligence...
-
Maybe more similar to Windows 2003? If so, I've ran 1.0.0B5 on Win 2003.
-
If you run it there must be a way to stop it coming up!Yes, the way is to disable UAC. Please do not ask again until done so. :)
-
This is smth for which I suspect Windows Firewall being guilty. It often unblocks apps long time after user has made the settings (maybe after restarting Windows).
-
On first shot, your sources might be slow. Have you tested in a LAN hub, to start with?
-
Аха, има разлика от около 75 реда.
-
Трябва да се направят, а не ми е известно още да има такива.
-
Моля, провери пак настройките. Някои човки се променят при ъпгреида. Аз ще инсталирам 1.0.1 вероятно довечера.
-
Да, и Крис това ми каза по ПМ. :)
Some site and forum suggestions.
in Site Feedback
Posted
Thanks for the input, I hope that Lee soon will have enough time to look at the issues you have found. As for the BG forum id, afaicr it was created first of all the others, if this could explain its id. If you like to help with the BG section with translating manuals, helping users, etc., feel free to do so according to your free time and skills. :)