Zlobomir

1. It it will not confuse other clients, I am for it. Anyway, each client has taken smth from the others, if each author says "It will not be of use for the other clients" inter-client features would never be added. Besides, we think for our users, it they can benefit, and the users of other clients do not suffer in any way, it is fine. 2. IMHO not many times too. 3. Indeed, why to lose file info?

Накратко, така е защото: 1. Без ТТН може да се разпространят повредени файлове. 2. Няма как да се принудят всички потребители да си обновят клиентите. На практика в момента клиентите с ТТН поддръжка свалят само от себеподобни, а старите клиенти, тези без ТТН, свалят от всички. Глупаво, но факт.

Note: 3-4 topics on this, could be merged...

Apex V:s.X errors should be reported to SMT directly, discussion about this mod is not appreciated here (again, I personally will be happy if SMT joins Apex team, but this is not in my scope). As for SDC++, BM reads quite regularly our forums. But as a matter of fact, bug is present on my 1.0.0.B4 as well. I hope it will be fast and easy to fix, it might be related even to http://forums.apexdc.net/index.php?showtopic=2015

Afaik Sababa is born in Israel, so it needs investigation on how Hebrew is supported in it. Unfortunately this is quite over my knowledge. BM, Crise?

If you still have not started rebuilding share, try switching to "Use old sharing user interface" in File>Settings>Options. It will allow manipulations with virtual folders, as far as I can remember, altho afaik we sorted this one long ago... Still, worth to try.

NOD 2.7 here, all ok for now.

My choice too, Ctrl+click can be used at the same time for several hubs "outta the area". But similarly, Connect buttoon is greyed after clicking OK of Properties frame. So, altho hub is selected (blue), Connect is grey. This pisses me out.

Needs investigation of your network connections when you enter the hub in question. Something should give us a clue, right? As for http://forums.apexdc.net/index.php?showtopic=1986 - you explained it so that each post from BM in the last months could be the solution... Maybe this is why deletion of Hashsh*t does not help. Still wondering how Satan figured out that I am right, maybe you both exchanged PMs. :)

Hello, Apex DC++ is based on Strong DC++, afaik Strong DC++ does not have language support problems. Please try same setup with Strong DC++ and let us know whether the problem is present there as well, thanks.

Known issues are FAT32 incompatibility with files > 4GB and full target drive, if Temp directory is on another disk. Happened before with other users at least.

Or played with the Socket sizes in "Experts only"?

If not late, this somehow resembles my network setup, hub in my LAN, behind the router. Forgive if I am wrong. My settings: DC hub PC: 10.10.10.1 DC client PC: 10.10.10.3 Conn. Settings: FW w/ manual PF, entered external IP, bind address 0.0.0.0 Fav. Hub settings for the respective hub: Address: 10.10.10.1:412 (it is on 412 port), and "default" as Connection. I do not see the VPN influence here... True, another interface, but that's why 0.0.0.0 should work ok.

Actually Crise should have read this already and should has... barked or bit in PM, if appropriate. :blink:

Well, if the menu selection technically is possible to chance core and restart Apex, it should be OK. So why not add it even w/o core change? Imo .699 emulating lower is OK, the reverse - .691 as 699 is bad (presenting smth old as modern).

And TGO is unfortunately full (inaccessible) sometimes. Maybe distribution by countries is not so bad, also we willnot depend on a single home connection, but on many. I am thinking of some franchising scheme, just like McDonalds, so hubs will be equal. ;)

Sorry, but I am afraid you need to be more specific at this to get a useful answer. Shot in the dark: http://forums.apexdc.net/index.php?s=&...ost&p=16049

My prophecy is > 1,000,000 downloads up to a month. ;)

Why you think it is incorrect? /off I am w/o I-net at home due to a storm, should be fixed soon,acc. to my ISP. /off

I think because it won't allow so flexible arrangement after that.

Yes, Mikey is right. Unfortunately I have lead the topic in... damn bad direction. It was not meant to bash at anyone, just to bring attention. And the place was badly chosen indeed.

1. Случва(ло) се е. Получава се от това, че Апекс презаписва файла при изход от програмата, и ако се затвори "зле", файлът остава празен. Доколкото знам, работи се по това (система като документите в Word). Засега може да си правиш архиви от време на време. Имаше и скрипт за това, тук на форума: http://forums.apexdc.net/index.php?showtop...4&hl=script (браво Aztek). :crying: 2. И аз бях предубеден към това, но направих тестове и всичко е наред при мен си.

Also, in TCD, bot was kicking for URLs. Not a big deal, except that each user with "Visit DC_CLIENT_PAGE while I return" in Away message got kicked. I found it while PM-ing users in an attempt to VIP them. :crying:

Happened again, two times right one after the other.

It is absolutely the same behaviour, when I press enter to send the line, Apex freezes, then follows high HDD activity, then HDD load fails. Next, on opening Taskman I see it using 0-1% CPU and 60-70 MB RAM. And stays unresponsive for a very long time, until I kill it.