Ð.Sp!dér

Member
  • Content count

    107
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ð.Sp!dér


  1. Code: c0000005

    Version: 0.3.0 (2006-11-12)

    Major: 5

    Minor: 1

    Build: 2600

    SP: 2

    Type: 1

    Time: 2006-11-16 19:18:34

    TTH: HMG7SFF6MHOSHQMZI6IRCYSXTEFITXI4ET5276Y

    0xFFFFFFFF: ?

    ApexDC!0x0055F432: ?

    ApexDC!0x0057C6CD: ?

    ntdll!0x7C9037BF: RtlConvertUlongToLargeInteger

    ntdll!0x7C90378B: RtlConvertUlongToLargeInteger

    ntdll!0x7C90EAFA: KiUserExceptionDispatcher

    ApexDC!0x0055E563: ?

    ApexDC!0x005545F4: ?

    ApexDC!0x00431448: ?

    ApexDC!0x004316FA: ?

    ApexDC!0x0042CB88: ?

    ApexDC!0x0041C484: ?

    USER32!0x77D48744: GetDC

    USER32!0x77D48826: GetDC

    USER32!0x77D489DD: GetWindowLongW

    USER32!0x77D48A20: DispatchMessageW

    Code: e06d7363

    Version: 0.3.0 (2006-11-12)

    Major: 5

    Minor: 1

    Build: 2600

    SP: 2

    Type: 1

    Time: 2006-11-19 20:15:41

    TTH: HMG7SFF6MHOSHQMZI6IRCYSXTEFITXI4ET5276Y

    kernel32!0x7C812A5B: RaiseException

    ApexDC!0x0055CFCA: ?

    ApexDC!0x004CD96F: ?

    ApexDC!0x004CD76C: ?

    ApexDC!0x0045E056: ?

    ApexDC!0x0045941D: ?

    ApexDC!0x0041C484: ?

    USER32!0x77D48744: GetDC

    USER32!0x77D48826: GetDC

    USER32!0x77D489DD: GetWindowLongW

    USER32!0x77D48A20: DispatchMessageW

    ApexDC!0x00446BD0: ?

    Code: c0000005

    Version: 0.3.0 (2006-11-12)

    Major: 5

    Minor: 1

    Build: 2600

    SP: 2

    Type: 1

    Time: 2006-11-24 22:32:00

    TTH: HMG7SFF6MHOSHQMZI6IRCYSXTEFITXI4ET5276Y

    ntdll!0x7C918FEA: RtlpWaitForCriticalSection

    ntdll!0x7C90104B: RtlEnterCriticalSection

    ApexDC!0x004CF797: ?

    ApexDC!0x00480A7B: ?

    ApexDC!0x0041C484: ?

    USER32!0x77D48744: GetDC

    USER32!0x77D48826: GetDC

    USER32!0x77D489DD: GetWindowLongW

    USER32!0x77D48A20: DispatchMessageW

    ApexDC!0x00446BD0: ?

    When I clicked on it from the queue > Remove, it crahed. Was using NetLimiter 2 Pro capped at 2 MB/s at the time... Also, I choose 10 segments. About 280+ people had that file (~350 MB, executable).


  2. Good ideea. But the error i meant earlyer would do wonders !

    Imagine downloading something and waching very carefuly the download progress.

    After 10 seconds or so, the download gets killed and a weird text is shown.

    Imagine the look on their face when it says oDC is 3 years old and was dropped by the developers...

    Not a very happy one ? Most people in Romania don't even know how to read proper English.

    Especially the technical/new age stuff...


  3. It's because of my AC power supply. More activity implies more power consumption.

    Electricity's a bitch where I live and the PC dies if my HDD reads/writes over 8 MB/s in total. At least in my case.

    When a i see uploads at my full uploading speed and juicy shares (50+ GB), why can't I get filelists ??

    Oh, it's because of those 50% oDC-using stupid people that don't even know other DC++ clients exist !

    And the fact is, they don't even care !! They got used to the 'Eye" icon and think that is the BEST client EVER MADE !

    It's sad actually... :ermm:


  4. Then make it Italic for Join/Part and Underlined for real content change. And even Strikethrough for hub offline. This is only an example.

    Great ideea. But offline hubs are already marked in red. So there's no point. Could become an option though...

    "Bolding" tabs could keep their width by either changeing their font or by shortening their name.

    If, say, "Hub of the Great Emperor of Sausage Cans" (or similar) turns into the short form "Hub of the Great Emp..." to keep the width and the tabs not moving at all ! Firefox 2 uses this tehnique :) and it works very well.

    Moving tabs can get confusing sometimes...


  5. From my point of view, SearchSpy should be illegal. In some countries, members of "the law" are joining random hubs in order to find notorious "kriminelz" downloading illegal material. What do you think it will happen if you provide them with names and IPs ? They can easyly get search warrants from court and break into your appartment and legally search your computer ! Not even the pr0n is legal...

    Considering they can fine you the full price of the downloaded software, what happens if you download the latest C++ bulder as a Suite tagged at over $3.000 ? And what about Windows ? Are you using a licensed copy ?

    Not to meantion the music you download(ed) ! Every song is divided by the number of tracks the album has. And if the album is tagged at $15 and has 13 tracks, one song costs about $1. Imagine how much 2.000+ tracks cost ! Some albums cost more.

    Long story's short: This feature could get alot of people into trouble !

    .


  6. Hello, I've got several suggestions [see above, the first post]

    -TTH is created by CRC and filesize so the first request is out. Based on those, every file is unique even if it's renamed or contains different attributes (like Read-only or Archive)

    -Animated smiles would be nice, but in some cases would spike the CPU, and Apex already does that (beng based on StrongDC++ and all...)

    -Turning off the mainchat would be SO NICE ! Good thinkin' ! Did you know that when someone types somethnig in the mainchat YOU download a few bytes from that hub ? If you're present in over 10 hubs, those bytes turn into kilobytes ! And those kilobytes affect download speeds. Not by much, but still... Some people chat like crazy on some hubs ! For them, that's the primary point in using a DC client. Downloading comes second.

    -As for the browser ideea, Firefox simply rulz ! It's much safer, bloking malicious scripts on webpages and ****... Plus the loads of add-ons and extensions that it supports. Like weather, custom search bars, pop-up blockers, IRC, etc.

    Edit: wtf is LUA ?? :)


  7. It seems they can download stuff just by searching and we can't even get their filelists ! That's just lame...

    Apex should not allow this. Please consider implementting a setting because it's not fair. A checkbox or something...

    Once upon a time a lame-ass user using oDC (wich is extremely popular here in Romania btw) downloaded a file at about 6 MB/s and it took 3 whole frikin' minutes ! The (loo)user is in my LAN probabily lives in the same building or near by.

    So, my computer crashed that time because of the huge speed. And I had to reboot :)

    After he got what he was looking for, closed oDC. I don't know everyone in my neighberhood so I don't know who downloaded from me. Plus there were 3.000+ users in that hub.

    And I did'n even get his filelist... Goddam leechers !!!


  8. Currently, I think is a bug. Alot of "system-trayed" programs are using this.

    When I just want a quick preview on how thigs are going I just click it. Then I have to drag the mouse all the way over to the corner of the screen to click the minimize button [ _ ] and that implies alot of work :)

    Also, when I stay up all night I'm lazy. Go figure :)

    A shortcut would be to click the program in the taskbar once. But sometimes, that's too far as well ;)

    So I'm one lazy m0fo. Sue me ! ^_^

    My point is that once the icon in the system tray is clicked, and shows the program, another click on it shoud hide it. Or better yet, why does this program have to show up in the taskbar again ? ;)


  9. Sounds nice, huh ? An option auto-getting a user's filelist that was downloading from you at a certain speed. If someone was to download from you at >= 1 MB. Mabey a user/filelist check ? If that user has shared less then say, 10 GB, closing the filelist because it won't be worth it that much... I think it's a nice ideea.


  10. Code: c0000005

    Version: 0.3.0 (2006-11-12)

    Major: 5

    Minor: 1

    Build: 2600

    SP: 2

    Type: 1

    Time: 2006-11-16 19:18:34

    TTH: HMG7SFF6MHOSHQMZI6IRCYSXTEFITXI4ET5276Y

    0xFFFFFFFF: ?

    ApexDC!0x0055F432: ?

    ApexDC!0x0057C6CD: ?

    ntdll!0x7C9037BF: RtlConvertUlongToLargeInteger

    ntdll!0x7C90378B: RtlConvertUlongToLargeInteger

    ntdll!0x7C90EAFA: KiUserExceptionDispatcher

    ApexDC!0x0055E563: ?

    ApexDC!0x005545F4: ?

    ApexDC!0x00431448: ?

    ApexDC!0x004316FA: ?

    ApexDC!0x0042CB88: ?

    ApexDC!0x0041C484: ?

    USER32!0x77D48744: GetDC

    USER32!0x77D48826: GetDC

    USER32!0x77D489DD: GetWindowLongW

    USER32!0x77D48A20: DispatchMessageW

    This is my first since I upgraded to 0.3.0 and my 5th (or 6th) since I'm using ApexDC++ ...


  11. Are you guys aware that StrongDC++ v2.03 is out ? Is this release based on that too ?

    Edit: Yes you did. Sorry for asking. The changelog says CVS200. Good job.

    I'm hoping it will work using the same settings from v0.2.2 because I would really hate it if I were to hash 115 GB again ! Also, I had a few wierd crashes from now and then... Hope you've plugged all the holes. :blink:

    Edit 2: I love the blue folders (darker would've been nicer) but hate the green hub icons !

    Yellow folders are probably the best and blue hub icons (or a shade of whit-ish purple) would've looked nicer.


  12. It's not about the pr0n, it's about the user. I hate him.

    Ok, if you don't like it then I think users with small download like that (under 1kB) should have their own specially reserved slot.

    Personaly, if you really want something THAT bad, you should go buy it.

    Not sit around and wait for "several months". That's just crazy ! Or find a better source.