Crise
Management-
Content count
3008 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Crise
-
-
This shouldn't be too difficult, but Crise needs to give you final approval.alredy did...
-
i can't see the "permanent ignore list" feature.......where is it?it is there but everything looks as before, but when you ignore/unignore someone, it get's saved so they will still be ignored when you restart ;)
-
crashed again todayany thing i can do to fix it?
delete entire dl que maybe?
and all temp files?
dont want to, but will if yall think it will fix it
one way to fix it for now would be disable segmented downloading, then again apex pr1 is about to come, so you could aswell wait till that :)
-
Don't get dissapointed if it can't do everything you expect it to, remember this is just a preview (read: feature incomplete, but stable)
-
And TBI's code requires searching for partial sources, and managing them in queue.Whatever....
-
Seems like it was to do with searching and adding partial sources to your queue manager.... other than that, we can't help you.Look forward to ApexDC++, it's nearly ready.
Lee, wrong. This is TBI related, have seen this same crash reported before (in the old forums), i belive
-
You didn't know? Hahaha.Yep, i didn't know...
Build in the Mozilla engine or something if you need to render stuff.That'd be a bloat, build in mozilla engine just to render few pages, no way...
But as said we don't most likely need to render any stuff, so no worries :P
-
thats one of the funiset computer jokes ive herd for a while cheersBalder, i am seriously considering changing your nick to Cheers, in here and in TGO (in tgo only if i can get sideys permission though)
Sorry to say it GS_Death, but I do think it would be a very bad move. It would be massive bloat and make the program worse. I can't iamgine ApexDC++ ever including a web browser. It'd probably end up just using the IE engine.... which would be even worse. I can see advantages to it, but no, it won't be happening anytime soon (I hope).Yeah, browser won't ever be added, i have thought adding an ability to use ie's engine to parse a single html page if needed, but that's not likely...
Edit: also since when have we had a moderator :P
-
1. There is such a stupid command in the context menu: "Remove From All", which is placed right over the command "Force Attempt". First, this command is practically never used, second it is close to the oftenly used command "Force Attempt" - and sometimes "Remove From All" was clicked accidentally.Please place "Remove From All" together with these which are also rarely used or delete it at all.
2. Please add an ability for resuming of file-list download. Connection on public hubs is often unstable, user's file-list size is large. In this way file-list downloads in 20-30 attempts, as a result time and bandwidth is lost.
Zlobomir: thanks for the translation (and all the past ones )
aninerbe: i'll see what i can come up with to reduce accidental clicks, about resuming filelists i'm not sure, but will take a look, maybe add an option or something...
edit: Lee was faster you can ignore most of my post, and it's called separator Lee :D
-
are you going to give them more features? please no i want them same level so i can say mines better and be totlly lieingread my post again, you'll find your answer in it :D
-
um when that was posted the date was so passed lol the one before it was posted 7-30 2006 which is july 30 2006 if you didnt knowmaybe he means next year :D
-
the actual linux version will it be nearly as good as the windows version im asking for a friend or 2 they run linuxProably not as feature rich as windows version, but remember good is not same as ammount of features.
-
how will it look like in 32x32 or 48x48 pixels?i have ico versions of those on my hd (waitting to get into an alpha) and they look just fine :)
-
How come my stuff is called super seeding? I never worked that out. It has almost nothing to do with seeding, let alone supermanWell super-seeding sounds better than partial file transfer enchantment
also to those who didn't know the shape of the logo was decided amongst few shapes, by a poll where beta testers and donators get to cast their vote...
-
from where can i download apeX?Nowhere, yet anyway ;)
-
Lot's of people speaks about it... nah there is a lot more important things to implement sooner. If it's an OP client simply hideshare is enough.I completly agree ;)
-
A vacation
in Lounge
It's not just about the icons, we still have a fair bit of features to add in there before preview.Yes, but once we have the icons we can change plans if needed and release earlier, but as long as we don't have them, it's not possible to do that...
-
A vacation
in Lounge
Indeed, hopefully we can have a public launch before I go.. so less work is given to Crise and developers to organise a release.After you get the program icons , we can have public preview release any time :stuart: (as i can't promise you final nor even beta, as they'd take much more work than preview release)
-
A vacation
in Lounge
You don't need to worry (in case you posted this to avoid demotion)
As next time we will demote testers once the first public release of ApexDC++ is out (no matter if it's preview release, final or beta) and in this demotion we will drop all testers that haven't been worthy of the position during this first set of alphas.
Oh, and have a nice vacation :)
-
Well i can't give a link to something that doesn't exist
But there will be a preview release of some sort before 1.0.0 Final
(at least there was plans for such release, but plans may change)
-
Thanks a lot balder, i put your list in bit more "compact" form, by removing some extra newlines
Also i just realized, that i haven't posted my entry yet, mine is:
"When I decide it's ready and get Lee to agree with me." :D
-
Maybe we should just release it on a date a tester guessed, so we don't have to give anyone the reward.no firstly that wouldn't be fair and secondly i refuse to work with pre-assigned release dates, but otherwise very good idea indeed :D
-
In case of duplicate entries, the first person to say an answer gets prioity over the copy cats.yeah, that's true, but actually you weren't the first one to say that, you were the second
(but since the first person that said "when it's ready" already has tester access, I/we just might make an exception this time)
-
I guess it will be release when it's ready.Is that a "legit" entry ?
I need to think of that, as if i say yes, all replies we'd get after this post would say "when it's ready" :)
For the Op version
in Feature Requests
Posted
don't think so, it's op version not a leecher tool...