terminator

I think it will be a solution if the developers of this program will go into the details you've posted above return to research and new ideas for that problem I found a program that has settings in the picture below Please someone explain the setting "config VPN and networks" and "Allow private (local) IP update IPs from webservice" if these 2 settings I can help my case

if possible I would like the source code for Visual Studio 2012 source code of the site gives me more errors

you're right here we used dc + + and made thanks to automatic port mapping methods, DC++ is able to open the ports it needs and obtain your external IP address as well Photo by setting seting dc++ on atashament I keep reading different cases and realize that this situation does not work Peers Behind a Common NAT First consider the simple scenario in which the two clients (probably unknowingly) happen to reside behind the same NAT, and are therefore located in the same private IP address realm, as shown in Figure . Client A has established a UDP session with server S, to which the common NAT has assigned its own public port number 62000. Client B has similarly established a session with S , to which the NAT has assigned public port number 62005. http://www.brynosaur...000000000000000 Suppose that client A uses the hole punching technique outlined above to establish a UDP session with B , using server S as an introducer. Client sends a message requesting a connection to B. S responds to A with B 's public and private endpoints, and also forwards A's public and private endpoints to B. Both clients then attempt to send UDP datagrams to each other directly at each of these endpoints. I would be an alternative to this case! Client A and Client B uses a group setting something like this Most importantly, the group name, username and local IP this group you must recognize and hub and xml file that you send to the client must contain him and the group with information example <Nodes> <Source CID="user ID" group="groupname" I4="IP address" U4="UDP port" SI="filesize" PF="is it partial file?"/> <Node CID="user CID" I4="IP address" U4="UDP port"/> </Nodes> </Nodes> groupname <Node CID="user CID" I4="IP address"/> </Nodes> When the client receives the xml must be a condition if the user of the client receives from the server xml file is part of that group with the change ip if not part of the group remains on public ip expect answers for this idea!

according to tests made ​​me think that this is a bug dc client.

excuse me but my English is not very good! hub isn't on the private network, is on internet is have an ip 86.123.234.248 are 2 university campus, each having a server used as rooter for the private network inside each campus (IP 192.168.0.1/255) server ip university campuses are 193.231.40.44/45 passive mode is the only option to connect to the hub and to download from other users outside the campus users on the private network within a campus can not downlad each other using passive mode hub is made just for the two campuses passive mode and NAT traversal allows users to connect from one campus to campus but not inside two private networks within campuses mode active allows connecting users within the private network on campus 1 and not allow users to connect to the campus 2 Green Line allows connection The red line does not allow connection

I created a hubdc witch adch++ 2.81 on linux I tried it in our university campus where we have NAT ( IPs 192.168.0.1/255) passive mode is the only option. After some checking I saw this I am in this situation and works well But the next situation does not work what settings should be made ​​to work?

Current Software hub ADCH++ ADC DSHub ADC NextHub ADC µHub ADC luadch ADC What do I need to use passive mode What settings do I need to get conection pasive to pasive (on hub software) i need a tutorial with settings

About the passive-to-passive user connection. How does that work? I tried it in our university campus where we have NAT ( IPs 192.168.0.1/255) passive mode is the only option. In this case, connection to passive users in passive mode didn't work - I suppose it has to do something with the "NAT Traversal". Would it be possible to support passive-to-passive connections even when no NAT is in effect?