Pothead

Yup, looks like nobody tried my suggestion But if baba.runner's method of replicating this indeed works, then it does imply that there is a bug somewhere. :)

/rebuild always sorted this error for me :P

From a quick look at the Exception info it looks very similar to a crash i tried to fix with dcdm for a long time (try & catch failed in inline code :w00t:). Maybe the bug was inherited from DC++ but it'll no longer have that problem since it ditched WTL. BrotherBear, most of the crashes you have experienced is due to this . . . . d:\development\apexdc\final\trunk220\trunk\windows\flattabctrl.h(608): FlatTabCtrlImpl<FlatTabCtrl=0x02DC8260,ATL::CWindow=0x0006E1BC,ATL::CWinTraits<1442840576=0x0046B5A5,0> >::TabInfo::update d:\development\apexdc\final\trunk220\trunk\windows\flattabctrl.h(163): FlatTabCtrlImpl<FlatTabCtrl=0x00000000,ATL::CWindow=0x0006E2D0,ATL::CWinTraits<1442840576=0x02DC8260,0> >::setDirty d:\development\apexdc\final\trunk220\trunk\windows\privateframe.h(156): PrivateFrame::addClientLine looks like a PrivateMessage is causing trouble with the Tabs. If you get this often, i would recommend closing hubs, and finding out which hub is sending this pm. Avoid that hub. And also report that hub here so the developers can get an idea of what is going wrong. :(

erh, are you being serious ? :)

Limit your upload then to about 16kb/s :)

Turn emulation off ?

Yes. Read the changelog. ;)

So /switch has been removed ? (i believe that was the command). So why on the "How to Compile" guides are people still being told to use the Patched WTL. Since the modification to WTL was for this. Or has more changes been done to WTL for some other feature ?

DC++'s default behaviour is leave the blank, and it'll choose a random port for you each startup. And it's done that for a very long time. :)

Well ataraxia if you were intrested in keeping an eye on how this is progressing in DC++ (which will then hopefully filter down to Apex via Strong) keep an eye on this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dcplusplus/+bug/224811 Of course need more ADC hubs . . .

Yes Satan. You also need to tick the box for logging PM's. :)

No it's not currently possible with ApexDC. The reason this cannot be done isn't really "by design" more of "design flaw" in the NMDC protocol. The whole "guess-a-user" situation. Can be made to work perfectly in ADC hubs. .Nothing. by Carraya (still in alpha / beta) has made the best attempt at working around the NMDC issues that i've seen. Oh and that only works if the user connects through the right hub. Don't expect this of DC++ or mods of it based on a version less than 0.68 heh, if you want more detail than "guess-a-user" being the problem . . . *sigh* wish DC++'s old forums still worked, then i could point you at numerous topics there.

And fixed upstream if it comes from there ? (StrongDC++ or DC++)

Not beta, "unstable release". Arbitrary classification. It's more stable than 0.705 :thumbsup: Exactly. 2 weeks. :blink:

he can download normally with 0.674 because that version will download of anyone. The check didn't come into about 0.694 (?). While 0.401 supports TTH, it doesn't support TTHL and TTHF which were introduced in 0.402. :thumbsup:

It's actually "fully support TTH". So yes they do hash, they just don't support TTHL and TTHF. And no DC++ won't download from them either. That actually error message has been inherited from DC++ into Apex. So just block any client less based on DC++ less than 0,402 from getting in the hub. :blink:

That will be in relation to ZPipe \ ZLine depending on which support Apex & ptokaX use. If indeed you only get it from ptokaX, you should really inform PPK. The ptokaX & lua forum's addy is http://luaboard.sytes.net/ :thumbsup:

Microsofts CriticalSection in ntdll isn't very safe. Typically Microsoft don't understand the meaning of Critical. ApexDC does something which windows doesn't like, so it spits it's dummy out.

There is already a few different adc hub softwares out. It's the hub owners who need the push now. More people using these new hubsofts, more people complaining about lack of features / bugs, the hubsoft improves. ;)

Next version of dc++ should have this sorted. i.e. if chunk done in short space of time, it automatically increases size of next chunk. or sommit ;)

https://bugs.launchpad.net/dcplusplus/+bug/190015 :)

Are the files which "all download slots are taken" set to lowest priority ?

Isn't that horizontal view from the patched WTL ? I sure the only changes to WTL are for that option.

ADC is here. It just needs hub owners to switch to ADC hubs now. ;)

No Setting in Experts Only ?