AddictedToChaos

That's incredible news. I will soon switch over linux and this will be a great reason to hurry the switch :thumbsup:

That's already implemented. Go to the hub properties that you want to use passive mode, check the "Firewall (passive, worst case)" and reconnect to the hub :blushing:

Well done guys :)

All right then. I'll do this next time that will happen, thanks ;)

I had a crash after a long time in Apex just right now. I have had it working all day. The crash occured when I tried to delete an incomplete file from download queue. When I pressed the yes button on the confirmation remove dialog, Apex froze for a while and then it crashed. The problem with that file was that 2% was remaining and although 52 users were standby to give me the file, the connection wasn't starting. That's why I decided to remove it. To download it again from the start Hopefully, an exceptioninfo file was created :w00t: Here it is. exceptioninfo.txt

Great news!!! Congrats from me too I think ApexDC++ deserves such a popularity cause it's probably the most stable DC around (besides it's wonderful features of course) Thanks again guys for this great program :w00t:

Hey Greg. Nice job there. I like them The colors are fitting well with the general theme i guess.

Nice work guys I like the new installer package very much :D

Very nice HATRED. They're like Ubuntu Dapper Drake Gnome colour ;)

It's the "minimum search interval" option, in the advanced tab ;)

Yeap. That's for sure. But hey, being active is a bit tricky if you don't know a lot of basic stuff lol.

Whatever man. In the end, the user will learn somehow, about this command or option :ermm:

If someone, knows how to make dc++ works, he definately know about the right click menu there...

There is also, in right click context menu of the hub button.

Two useful things. 1. Keep Finished Downloads list after client restarts. 2. Ability to save/open an offline hublist. (very handy for dial up users and for hublist.org downfalls )

I had another crash. Code: c0000005 Version: 0.1.0 Major: 5 Minor: 1 Build: 2600 SP: 2 Type: 1 Time: 2006-08-04 19:33:25 TTH: SNNSE225TMBCCP3CHH6SQUP4FBQM2EZXBVDXFII kernel32!0x7C81EDBF: FindActCtxSectionGuid kernel32!0x7C81ED6D: FindActCtxSectionGuid kernel32!0x7C81ECBA: FindActCtxSectionGuid l:\lf share\unshared\apexdc\svn\client\text.cpp(241): Text::utf8ToWide l:\lf share\unshared\apexdc\svn\client\text.cpp(234): Text::utf8ToAcp l:\lf share\unshared\apexdc\svn\client\text.h(57): Text::utf8ToAcp l:\lf share\unshared\apexdc\svn\client\searchmanager.cpp(44): SearchResult::toSR l:\lf share\unshared\apexdc\svn\client\clientmanager.cpp(386): ClientManager::on l:\lf share\unshared\apexdc\svn\client\speaker.h(105): Speaker<ClientListener>::fire<ClientListener::X<18>=0x010F2B00,NmdcHub *=0x0887FD50,stlp_std::basic_string<char=0x0887FD6C,stlp_std::char_traits<char>=0x0887FD4C,stlp_std::allocator<char> >=0x010F29E4,int=0x0887FD54,__int64=0x0887FD88,int=0x0887FD67,stlp_std::basic_ tring<char=0x0459B318,stlp_std::char_traits<char>=0x022FADA0,stlp_std::allocator<char> >=0x00000000,bool> l:\lf share\unshared\apexdc\svn\client\nmdchub.cpp(349): NmdcHub::onLine l:\lf share\unshared\apexdc\svn\client\speaker.h(51): Speaker<FavoriteManagerListener>::fire<FavoriteManagerListener::X<5>=0x00000000,FavoriteUser> l:\lf share\unshared\apexdc\svn\client\bufferedsocket.cpp(242): BufferedSocket::threadRead l:\lf share\unshared\apexdc\svn\client\bufferedsocket.cpp(512): BufferedSocket::checkSocket l:\lf share\unshared\apexdc\svn\client\bufferedsocket.cpp(528): BufferedSocket::run l:\lf share\unshared\apexdc\svn\client\thread.h(134): Thread::starter f:\rtm\vctools\crt_bld\self_x86\crt\src\threadex.c(348): _callthreadstartex f:\rtm\vctools\crt_bld\self_x86\crt\src\threadex.c(326): _threadstartex I opened almost 25 hubs at once lol. But I do it every time. After a while, it crashed.

Personally, i can manage to use the "/c" command, but i think that an option for that, wouldn't be so much trouble for the client. Or would be? Do what you wish, about that. :D

Allright. But what's better, than the simplicity of an one click button? lol Doesn't matter. If you say so, then i won't argue with you :D

I miss this, too :D

Huh, Nanowar. Very funny project. :(

I see... Personally,I just apply a search string in the filter box, then if i don't get the results i've been expected, i just clear the box, hit enter and search for other keywords.

That's right. It's a minor incident i could say :thumbsup:

Nice thought Greg :thumbsup:

Why do you need more than one at a time? Personally, I've never had the need to use multiple search filters. I guess you have more advanced needs :thumbsup:

As Greg said, this problem is going to be solved somehow. So you don't need to worry about :thumbsup: