ifmn

Hi, have you tried enabling PAE[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension] in vista? In theory it should fix this(if your bios supports 4GB, which we know it does). As you know, the other solution is to use 64 bit OS. BTW you can always try some live linux distro with kernel with PAE.

Весели празници и от мен! :thumbsup:

http://forums.apexdc.net/index.php?showtopic=1614

maybe also +usercommands for ynhub, ptokax, etc, with ~all of the available commands.

something like this and this. //me shows off :)

здравей зелен - шернал си го; оранжев - в dl queue e; син - не се сещам дали въобще съм го виждал.

choice = freedom, whats the problem? more options and features -> better client. and btw see azureuses user mode for settings filtering. just my 2c.

1. afaik tcp and udp ports are two different things. that "too much traffic on one port" confused me, anyway - thats cleared; 2. yes, thats the point, especially low number ports are registered to specific services, ports from 50000 up are "dynamic", they aint registered, so the chance of a port collision is far smaller than using something like port 23/80/443/1234, etc. also this improves security, but i guess thats not important for you. the user can use whatever port he wants, of course, if some other app on his box doesnt use it, afaik; 3. i havent asked for any help, im just interested in tcp/ip. im eager to learn new stuff, i may be wrong, i may be right, arent forums like this created for exchange of knowledge and ideas? also fyi, whats wrong with wtf?

use 2 apps on the same port, wtf? and what is a "reliable" port? please state out why not to use such ports.

it always works, after all this is its purpose - checks your Q for files with same tth as in the user's filelist :blushing:

Well... u r fkcued up, m8. Two bad words: 1st - windows and 2nd (even worse) - vista. This "great" OS cant even move files properly, broke compatability with tons of programs, did much more and even caused me 5x more trouble than all my linux distros did. //I wont argue how lame it is any more, so please dont bother defending it.

Yes, I am. //Vista Ultimate

Code: c0000008 () Version: 1.0.0B4 (2007-08-07) Major: 6 Minor: 0 Build: 6000 SP: 0 Type: 1 Time: 2007-09-10 21:09:06 TTH: 7CNQCQXDGEV7S2IDTUSYEW73M722LLS7BVOOXDI ntdll!0x77DC68B0: ? I got disconnected from all hubs, tried "reconnect disconnected" - didn't work. Manually reconnected in one hub and Apex crashed. After the crash i could see the "connecting to..." msg.

Crashed again with the same (last) error msg, i was away from pc... A question: are these "ntdll!0x77D92E7B: ?"-kinda messages helpful or am i wasting my time here?

I think it'll be usefull to be able to move several usercommands simultaneously, like you can in favs. Now its actually faster to do this be editing the xml :stuart: edit: why not add moving of fav dirs? now you cant move them (by setings)