NadaWTB
Member-
Content count
16 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by NadaWTB
-
-
Would someone please post some working raw commands for Ptokax hubsoft, that will work in ApexDC++ 1.0.0B4. Thank you. :blushing:
-
I totally fell for it, a guy in my hub told me about it, so he had fallen for it too. Good one. :)
-
[15:30:52] <[bOT]GZ> Du er bannet fra denne hub af [OP]-Sings fordi: [bandwidth limited client];I have a 1024/512 connection and limit bandwidth to 512/256 because I need to use some of my bandwidth for work. What's the iffing problem? Others connect with dialup and that's no problem?
it is your computer and your bw, just use Netlimter
-
The anti-flood settings you seem to be talking about, are one users sending many message within a certain period of time? What was being suggested was that you go "semi-private", basically people can;t make messages in main chat, or send PMs to other users without being registered.then how do they ask to be regged?
-
Just for you, then:An optimal Client OP is Zion++ Blue...sin that its development has been interrupted...
- Zion++ Blue was the optimal OP client. It's a shame it is no longer being developed.
However creed that in the Operating version would have to be included functions of survey Fake Share, Fake TAG and Hacked Clients
- Anyway, I think that the OP version should include features for checking Fake share, fake tag and hacked clients.
A comfortable function would be also the limitation of the Lists and of the Client it controls to you, therefore to avoid possible Crash of the Client
-
had to manually go to the update page, the update in client stayed grey
also when I download the binary I get this when extracting
! C:\Documents and Settings\NadaWTB\Desktop\ApexDC++_0.2.1_binary.rar: Unexpected end of archive
! C:\Documents and Settings\NadaWTB\Desktop\ApexDC++_0.2.1_binary.rar: CRC failed in ApexDC++\ApexDC.pdb. The file is corrupt
! C:\Documents and Settings\NadaWTB\Desktop\ApexDC++_0.2.1_binary.rar: Unexpected end of archive
-
An optimal Client OP is Zion++ Blue...sin that its development has been interrupted...However creed that in the Operating version would have to be included functions of survey Fake Share, Fake TAG and Hacked Clients
A comfortable function would be also the limitation of the Lists and of the Client it controls to you, therefore to avoid possible Crash of the Client
-
ok to add more info, I am using Ptokax as you can see in my sig. I have the anti-flood settings turned on in the hubsoft. We do not let users self reg.
-
use an antiflood bot like NiTROwhere might I find NiTRO?
-
I need some advice as how to limit or stop this kind of hub flood:
05:44:17] <wemm7ltje2q> Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of.
[05:44:18] *** Parts: wemm7ltje2q
[05:44:20] *** Joins: joop2oopq
[05:44:22] <joop2oopq> Man is the only animal that blushes -- or needs to.
[05:44:23] *** Parts: joop2oopq
[05:44:25] *** Joins: koischkoisch
[05:44:27] <koischkoisch> I'm writing a book. I've got the page numbers done.
[05:44:28] *** Parts: koischkoisch
[05:44:32] *** Joins: piitpiitq
[05:44:34] <piitpiitq> If corn oil comes from corn, where does baby oil come from?
[05:44:35] *** Parts: piitpiitq
random nicks and ips, so banning all the ips is not a real option
we are a small hub, so going private is not a great option either
any help is greatly appreciated
-
I know the same, but in the way: Everyone has one, but not everyone shows it.Seriously, I don't think these commands take too much place or resources (if any). So in my a... opinion , let them be.
As a hub admin I would prefer my users not have these features. There is no reason for users to have and use those features, that is for OPs to worry about and if it is in there some users will attempt to set it up.
-
Congats guys on the 1.0 Public Beta release, I do realize this is just a early beta, but for a user client I think the client checking and raw commands should be removed. This is just my opinion and you know what that say about opinions and assholes, everyone has one and they usually stink. :thumbsup:
-
Split the post from the competition, since that's for entries.We've have been waiting for 2.00 mainly, and so development is going pretty fast.
Very Nice,
As Pothead can confirm, I have been asking for a new op client for quite awhile on the Ptokax forums.
After looking at StrongDC++ 2.01 and reading about an ApexDC++ Op client consisting of features from DCDM++, Zion++ and others, I am very excited at what I see can be the best Op client available to Admins and a very good user client. I will actively promote the ApexDC++ client to my hub, when ready for public consumption. I thank all of you working on this client to help make DC a better place. :P
-
ok Strong DC++ Version: 2.01
Release date: 26.7.2006
is this the one you have been waiting on to build ApexDC++?
-
August 1, 2012
Scroll-lock
in Feature Requests
Posted
Why was the scroll-lock taken out of Apex? It is irritating as hell to loose focus of the main chat and have to restart the client to regain it.