Mikey_69

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    91

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mikey_69

  8. Posted

    Crashed just 2 minutes ago, three times in a row, just cause I restarted it... Got a few downloads going, a few uploads, msn, winamp + a download window for winamp update (IE). Nothing i haven't done before, got a relatively small download queue, most annoying, can't get it to work, keeps crashing. over and over and over again..

    Code: c0000005 (Access violation)
    
Version: 1.0.0B4 (2007-08-07)
    
Major: 5
    
Minor: 1
    
Build: 2600
    
SP: 2
    
Type: 1
    
Time: 2007-09-15 17:03:26
    
TTH: 7CNQCQXDGEV7S2IDTUSYEW73M722LLS7BVOOXDI

    
ntdll!0x7C901010: RtlEnterCriticalSection
    
d:\cvs\apexdc++\trunk\client\merklecheckoutputstream.h(119): MerkleCheckOutputStream<MerkleTree<TigerHash=0x062DB018,1024>=0x00000151,1>::write
    
d:\cvs\apexdc++\trunk\client\chunkoutputstream.h(79): ChunkOutputStream<1>::write
    
d:\cvs\apexdc++\trunk\client\filteredfile.h(133): FilteredOutputStream<UnZFilter=0x062FB028,1>::write
    
d:\cvs\apexdc++\trunk\client\downloadmanager.cpp(533): DownloadManager::on
    
d:\cvs\apexdc++\trunk\client\userconnection.cpp(180): UserConnection::on
    
d:\cvs\apexdc++\trunk\client\speaker.h(64): Speaker<BufferedSocketListener>::fire<BufferedSocketListener::X<3>=0x02C1FF00,unsigned char *=0x02C1FF08,int>
    
d:\cvs\apexdc++\trunk\client\bufferedsocket.cpp(263): BufferedSocket::threadRead
    
d:\cvs\apexdc++\trunk\client\bufferedsocket.cpp(515): BufferedSocket::checkSocket
    
d:\cvs\apexdc++\trunk\client\bufferedsocket.cpp(531): BufferedSocket::run
    
d:\cvs\apexdc++\trunk\client\thread.h(161): Thread::starter
    
f:\sp\vctools\crt_bld\self_x86\crt\src\threadex.c(348): _callthreadstartex
    
f:\sp\vctools\crt_bld\self_x86\crt\src\threadex.c(326): _threadstartex

  9. Posted

    I got it sorted by creating new folders with the same names as the ones I moved from the old directory and then unchecked them in Settings - Sharing.

    Then I was free to add the new Virtual Directories in the new location. Got to remember this when I buy 2 new discs in the next months..

  12. Posted

    What I did was that I created a new folder inside my previous shared directory on disc C, then I could remove the virtual folder too, went to new disc G and added the moved folder with the same name... So smooth... But my share still looks like poop on a stick, but that's my fault...

  13. Posted

    It seems like I've been struck by a case of "forgetting-sh*t". I've recently bought a new 500 gb disc which I've hooked up and added to be shared. Moved a few files already shared to this new disc to free up space on the built in disc, which will result in the computer running smoother. Anywho, I moved the files, tried to add them to my share and get this "Virtual directory already exist".

    Had a small time out from DC and internet for a while and I've tried remembering what to do, but nothing pops up.

    Do I have to delete HashIndex to sort this? Or can I simply add folders to the existing directory which will fit the Virtual directory and then uncheck them in the Settings - Sharing before deleting them?

    Hope I didn't make a mess out of this, woke up about 15 minutes ago and checked my share, got sick and after a short "reaction" I decided to fix it, somehow...

  16. Posted

    Wouldn't a "true" connection timeout affect all the clones? And not just the "surplus" ones?

    How I understand what he's saying is that he can't download from the same user in multiple hubs (multisource one user so to speak).

    Same user in 4 hubs for example, and only 1 will work all the rest timeouts, sounds odd to me, but then again, I haven't been around dc for very long and have probably not seen all there is to see...

  17. Posted

    I agree, especially with Program files and Windows folder.

    It'd be nice to see a sign when trying to add those (even if just a parent directory) "This folder cannot be shared".

    Even if it is every single users own choice whether or not to share sensitive information it is oh so annoying to find users who share their entire C drive with nothing but junk..

    Sort of make Apex "junk proof". Although I have just about never seen a total noob use Apex you can't eliminate that fact. Can't be that hard to add that, or atleast an advisory that tells users a short warning of possible risks of sharing such things..

    Just my 2 dollars n 15 cents...

  18. Posted

    Maybe then add another button with "Do not share this folder", I have also clicked wrong, most often on my external disc (sharing the recycled folder isn't a big deal but still)...

    I think there should be a function that would cancel the adding of a directory (before hashing).

  20. Posted

    I understand the frustration over the same users having multiple of your slots open, but as long as you have decent upload speeds on both it's no worries for me...

    However, would I have the misfortune of finding a user who uploads with both slots at below 200kb/s I'd PM him/her and tell them that I cannot occupy a slot for them because of their speed and the estimated time it would take. (My waiting users queue never goes below 30 people). So I'd disconnect 1 of them after letting him/her know and let someone else have that slot...

  22. Posted

    I use

    Bitdefender 9 Professional Plus

    DaemonTools

    MSN

    ApexDC++

    Internet Explorer

    Mozilla Firefox (for some sites that don't play well with IE)

    Counterstrike

    Day of Defeat (+source)

    Wordpad

    hkSFV

    Winrar

    VLC (for everything but music)

    Winamp (for music)

    Adobe photoshop

    Imgburn

    Nero Express (for those files Imgburn can't handle)

    MessengerDiscovery Live

  23. Posted

    Would be really nice to have a choose language option, I often switch between Swedish and English, depending on mood.

    I have started translating Apex into Swedish, but many words can have multiple meanings and I'm trying to figure out which one to use. (anyone who wants to help me can PM me for a list of words I have q's about)

  25. Posted

    Shouldn't it stop sorting results once I erase the keywords and hit enter again? It has before... But now it keeps filtering out search hits not meeting my "Search in results" criteria..

    This is a new thing for the B4, worked fine on B3 all the way back to 0.4.0...