adrian_007
Member-
Content count
86 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by adrian_007
-
-
what took you so long to release x64 version? =D
-
if you merged with all my changes to port to x64 it should not be a problem - just a proper setup of the solution. another thing theres no really big difference between x64 and x86...
-
bm, but why hubsofts would restrict VE field? it's pointless, and afaik atm there's no such hubsoft. imo while merging to adc, we should say what's right and what's wrong in this mess - instead of banning for VE owners should ban ie. for low slotratio etc.
if this won't happen, adc will be next broken nmdc with less bugs...
about rsx++ and tag thigy, when using emulation it append user's description with short tag.
-
remove emulation at all in ADC - i did it
this way we'll get rid of emulation on new protocol. also ADC doesn't have problem "Turn on your tag" which in most cases forces me to use emulation [;
-
i believe src of the plugin is shipped with apex src.
-
afaik no, it's not going to be used.
-
indeed, ways of cheating in dc++ knows only the oldest wizards - it's a forbidden knowledge..... EOT
-
You certainly have knew, it's just I don't appreciate your sarcasm about modifications. Cheating clients are already exist, so what? Maybe you writing specifications or developing some reliable code to prevent it? Or don't you like the whole idea of open source? Or why do you bring this up at all?yes i don't like opne source... i don't like it so much that i've released rsx++.
and about the cheat clients - is it bad that user know about them? so maybe ppl shouldn't know about weapon, it's also a bad thing? kinda sux because all open comminity rely on information
-
like i woudlnt know...
also, idea is not all, you have to know how it works and how to do it...
-
slot locker, fake tag, fake share..... you can add many modifications ;D
-
indeed it's weird you can build it using vs2005... wondering how rsx++ exist then xD
-
hehe it's a nasty bug, but i found a quite nice solution for it
every string that goes outide the core is in utf8 - no matter if this comes from adc or nmdc
and when sending, nmdc decode it (adc leave it as is). imo best solution it's already implemented in latest build of rsx++ and works like a charm in lua ^^
-
well, i'd say bad encoding in plugin -> client and client -> plugin way :)
-
in rsx++ emulation can't be used in adc hubs. the only reason i leaved it for nmdc is "turn on your tag" problem :)
-
This script is for BCDC so if u got error it's not compatible with Apex. Read thats written at the beginning of your lua script.only want to say that all clients with lua have bcdc++ implementation...
-
Bug 1 [not serious]: The "Get IP" button attempts to fetch the IP of the computer. Normally this would be fine, however if one is behind a router, even if that router is configured to port-forward, that will automatically switch him to passive mode regardless of the setting. Since we are talking about the UPnP or manual port forwarding settings, I for one find it natural that the IP should be an internal one, and ApexDC++ should not attempt to automatically switch to passive mode. Automatically fetching the correct IP at startup seems to be working, though.do you have message about version in update dialog? i suppose not
i have similar problem, it appear to be in dc++ too.
SocketException throws WSAEADDRNOTAVAIL (10049)
i'm behind a router (well, behind 2 routers - first gets wireless connection, second share it with pc and notebook), internal ip is 192.168.2.102 and i bind to it, ports are forwarded.
with ip connect it's ok, but when it comes to connect ie to website, it fails.
-
for your own sake crise, add this lines to stdinc.cpp :blushing:
#if _VC80X || _VC90X #error You can't compile ApexDC++ under Visual C++ Express Edition! #endif
-
provides bcdc++ compatible scripting api
-
many small additions and facelifting :thumbsup:
from down(up)loader point of view, sdc = apex =)
-
when it's done =)
-
well, he's a free man and can do whatever he wants to... but app should be able to hash even this file... should it? ^^
-
maybe in not full meaning, but it surely will be patched - because of this troubles in nmdc :]
-
just a thing.... patching nmdc will only make adc life more complicated (in this scenarion, there's no reason to switch to adc, in case you're not developer/advanced user in dc world). instead focus on adc-extensions that would bring new ppl to this protocol ^^
-
I expect a release where at least the main programmer is satisfied that it's worth something.coder != perfect betatester
StrongDC++ GUI rewrite
in Client Discussion
Posted
oh well, we're all (bm, you, and me) in pretty much close timezones so... thats not a case anyway
if you need to drop a line that you want write sth that isn't done, you have plenty of ways - forum, pm, mail, dcdev (thats mine btw), it's also not a case. if you'd be willing to help, you'd find a way...
less marketing, more coding